On Darwin:

But at the same time, his days don’t seem very busy to us. The times we would classify as “work” consist of three 90-minute periods. If he had been a professor in a university today, he would have been denied tenure. If he’d been working in a company, he would have been fired within a week.

Today I worked from around 6am – 9am. Took my three kids to the park for a bit. Had some lunch. Back in the office at around 11 and then I was in and out till 2pm when my wife had to go out and I hung with the kids that didn’t go with them.

Is that a lazy schedule?

When I read these articles about Darwin or…whomever from the past that made big contributions and yet didn’t work all that much I wonder:

  • did they have “money” in some form so that they’re work didn’t need to generate income thus they were free to do what they wanted?
  • did they buy out of consumerism in some fashion?

Finally, like most others I wonder how on earth I can emulate this schedule of working a reasonable amount of time and having leisure time? I’ve got it better than most, but I’m still working on it in many ways.

Of course, I have reviewed the author’s book Rest. Yes you should read it.

2 responses to “The “lazy” people we have lauded in the past”

  1. Rick Torres Avatar

    I think most of us do what we can to valence our days. In the end I think it is about our choices and personal priorities.

    Best regards

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post’s permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post’s URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)