At least once a week I get a lead that turns out to be a project manager assembling a team of subcontractors for a project they're bidding, or have been hired to do.
My lead has the client and needs people with specific expertise and they have heard that I’m the guy to talk to about the membership or ecommerce portion.
This adds a tricky component to any relationship. Now I'm not just dealing with the client, but I'm dealing with the company that’s building the team.
As I’ve dealt with these relationships, here are the 6 things that I’ve found I need to require to make them work.
In way too many situations the company hiring the team wants to control every interaction, which means everything you want to communicate to the client must go through the project manager who relays it to the client.
This strategy practically guarantees you will have misunderstandings, since by the time your message reaches the client it has gone through 6 separate iterations.
That cycle gets repeated if/when the client responds back to you. That's 12 opportunities for a misunderstanding. When communication is going solely through the project manager you’re likely to run into something like this: The client said something was required, but the project manager figured it was just a ‘give in’ so they didn’t put it on your list and you didn’t figure it was in the scope.
That’s a recipe for an unhappy client, an unhappy project manager, and an unhappy YOU -- as you discuss what to do about what the client now perceives as a total botch-up. Something that was important to the client never got relayed to you, and now it's not in the project.
With a ‘team’ in the middle you’ve now actually got 2 clients, which means 2 times the client vetting. For that reason, I put the company building the team through my client vetting process.
Are they the type of organization I want to work with? Are the other members of the team people I can communicate with, who have the same general ideas about how things should work on the web?
Typically this is involves 2 calls -- the first with the person putting the team together then one with the whole team.
Both calls have to pass my client vetting process to move on to my next requirement.
Now we’re on the real client vetting. This is where I talk to the end client and decide if they are the type of person or organization I want to work with. I’m quite happy to have the project manager join the call (and really any call with the client) but I need to talk to the actual decision makers in the process, which may not be the person tasked with managing the website build.
I want to talk to the people in charge of approving the spending on the project. If I can’t talk to them then the call doesn’t happen and I don’t join the team.
I have this decision maker requirement for all projects.
During this call I will be asking my regular client vetting questions which involve ROI, and revenue and profits, so the company putting the team together needs to know ahead of time I'm going to ask. Some companies don't like this question.
I don’t work with people that aren’t willing to discuss those numbers out in the open. Without that knowledge I can’t help determine if the project even has a positive ROI for their business.
I wrote about your cash flow not being my problem a while ago.
It comes down to this: My payment terms apply to the client I'm invoicing. If it’s the company putting together the team, I don’t wait for their client to pay them before I get paid.
I expect the person or company I’m invoicing to keep their cash flow set up properly to cover their project expenses. If they set 30-day payment terms with the end client that just means they didn't plan their project properly, which should not affect my payment.
Finally, if the project I'm asked to bid on is an RFP, just count me out. The only time I do RFPs is when I’m paid to help write them. Because in that case, I’m the preferred contractor and we’re writing the RFP to match my skills so that another company can’t really meet the requirements.
When someone is putting together a team to bid on an RFP I’m just not interested, even if they feel they’re the preferred contractor. I have no way of verifying the contention that they're the preferred contractor, so to me it's just another RFP, which I consider a waste of my time.
Some of you are going to have heard that you can ‘charge less’ if you're part of a sub-contracted team because the client is handed to you. That’s a load of baloney.
I never buy that argument, because as you can see, the process above takes a lot of time. But it's necessary to make sure the project has a high likelihood of success. So while someone may be bringing me the opportunity to bid on a project they’re not cutting out any of my client vetting time.
In reality, they're actually increasing it, because in these instances I will go through 2 client vetting processes before I can even provide the team lead a cost estimate on the project.
So when I get the email asking if I’m up for being part of a team, what do I say? I send them the 6 requirements above as my response.
If they feel that those requirements are something they can work with then we move on to my initial client email with the prospective company so they know the types of questions I’m going to ask.
Only after I have those questions answered do I move on to a call with the company putting the team together. Only after that passes do I talk to the rest of the team, then the end client.
How do you deal with subcontracting roles?